Dical students; PS: Pharmacy students; SPICE: Student Perceptions of PhysicianPharmacist Interprofessional Clinical Education; TTUHSC: Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center. Competing interests The authors declare that they’ve no competing interests. Authors’ contributions JZ,EM,AM,and DF conceived and developed this study although JZ was a pharmacotherapy resident and assistant clinical instructor at Texas Tech University Well being Sciences Center. JZ recruited patients for participation in theZorek et al. BMC Health-related Education ,: biomedcentralPage ofclinic. EM coordinated pharmacy and medical students’ recruitment. EM and AM obtained SHP099 informed consent from sufferers and students. EM,AM,MS,and RY supplied clinical services and served as preceptors for students. JZ managed the data collection and entry processes. JZ and DF performed information analysis. JZ wrote the first draft on the manuscript.Safety and privacy specifications to get a multiinstitutional cancer research information grid: an interviewbased studyFrank J Manion,Robert J Robbins,William A Weems and Rebecca S CrowleyAddress: Details Science and Technologies,Fox Chase Cancer Center,Philadelphia PA,USA,Information Technology,Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center,Seattle WA,USA,Academic Technology,University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston,USA and Biomedical Informatics,University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine,Pittsburgh PA,USA E mail: Frank J Manion Frank.Manionfccc.edu; Robert J Robbins rrobbinsfhcrc.org; William A Weems william.a.weemsuth.tmc.edu; Rebecca S Crowley crowleyrsupmc.edu Corresponding authorPublished: June BMC Healthcare Informatics and Choice Creating ,: doi:.: October Accepted: JuneThis report is offered from: biomedcentral Manion et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access write-up distributed beneath the terms of the Inventive Commons Attribution License (http:creativecommons.orglicensesby.),which permits unrestricted use,distribution,and reproduction in any medium,provided the original work is effectively cited.AbstractBackground: Information protection is significant for all information systems that cope with humansubjects data. Gridbased systems for instance the cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid (caBIG) seek to develop new mechanisms to facilitate realtime federation of cancerrelevant data sources,like sources protected under a variety of regulatory laws,which include HIPAA and CFR. These systems embody new models for information sharing,and therefore pose new challenges for the regulatory neighborhood,and to individuals who would develop or adopt them. These challenges should be understood by both systems developers and system adopters. In this paper,we describe our function collecting policy statements,expectations,and specifications from regulatory choice makers at academic cancer centers inside the United states of america. We use these statements to examine fundamental assumptions concerning data sharing applying information federations and grid computing. Approaches: An interviewbased study of essential stakeholders from a sample of US cancer centers. Interviews had been structured,and PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28490900 utilised an instrument that was created for the purpose of this study. The instrument integrated a set of challenge scenarios challenging policy situations that have been derived during a fullday discussion of potentially problematic issues by a set of project participants with diverse knowledge. Every challenge scenario integrated a set of openended inquiries that had been created to elucidate stakeholder opinions and issues. Interviews have been transcri.