O conduct a posthoc Danshensu (sodium salt) analysis in which “phase in the activity
O conduct a posthoc analysis in which “phase inside the task” was incorporated as a aspect. A threeway mixed ANOVA with group (highlow socially anxious) because the betweensubjects issue, and mirror (presentabsent), and phase (trials to four, trials five to 30, trials 3 to 44) as withinsubjects aspects was carried out. The main effect of group remained important. Additionally, there was also a key effect of phase, F(two, 88) 9.9, p, .00, g2 .09, indicating that participants estimated that extra men and women had been looking at them because the process progressed. Importantly, there was also a significant phase six group 6 mirror interaction, F(2, 88) 4.92, p .0, g2 .05. Figure 2 illustrates this interaction. To additional investigate this interaction, separate twoway (group, mirror) ANOVAs have been conducted for each phase in the experiment. Inside the very first phase, there was a most important effect of group,Figure . Raise of high and low socially anxious participants’ estimates with boost of objective proportion of men and women searching in their path. Error bars show typical errors. doi:0.37journal.pone.006400.gMirror manipulation checkIt was anticipated that the mirror manipulation would raise selffocused consideration. We had been also interested to find out no matter whether it increased selfevaluation and anxiousness. Twoway mixed ANOVAs using the betweensubjects issue group (highlow socially anxious) plus the withinsubjects issue mirror (presentabsent) have been conducted to investigate the effects with the mirror manipulation on these variables. There had been main effects of your mirrors for concentrate of attention, F(, 94) 57.98, p, .00, g2 .38, and anxiousness, F(, 94) 22.three, p, .00, g2 .9, indicating that participants were much more selffocused and much more anxious when the mirrors have been present. There have been also principal effects of group for concentrate of interest, F(, 94) eight.83, p, .0, g2 .09, and for anxiousness, F(, 94) 38.four, p, .00, g2 .29, indicating that higher socially anxious folks have been much more selffocused and much more anxious than low socially anxious men and women. The group six mirror interactions for focus of attention, F(, 94) three.46, p .07, g2 .04, and anxiousness, F(, 94) 2.7, p .0, g2 .03, didn’t reach significance, indicating that the selffocused focus and anxiousness inducing effect in the mirrors did not differ substantially involving the two groups. For selfevaluation, the twoway ANOVA revealed a key effect on the mirrors, F(, 94) five.09, p, .00, g2 .4, and also a major effect of group, F(, 94) 25.79, p, .00, g2 .22, which were qualified by a group 6 mirror interaction, F(, 94) 8.2, p, .0, g2 .08. Separate paired ttests inside higher and low socially anxious participants revealed that higher socially anxious participants had been drastically additional selfevaluative when the mirrors were present, t(47) 4 p, .00. Low socially anxious participants did not significantly differ in selfevaluation within the two mirror situations, t(47) 0.90, p .37. All round, the mirror manipulation enhanced selffocused interest and anxiety in high and low socially anxious people, but only enhanced selfevaluation in the high socially anxious participants. This locating is constant with Clark Wells’ cognitive model [9], which proposes that selffocused consideration and selfevaluation go hand in hand in people with high socialPLOS A single plosone.orgEstimation of Being Observed in Social AnxietyTable two. Higher and low socially anxious participants’ estimates from the PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24126911 proportion of people today in the crowds who have been looking at them.High socially anxious (n 48) Mirro.